ANGELA CASEY PRESENTS AT “THE ANNOTATED GUARDIANSHIP APPLICATION” PROGRAM

I am grateful to Jan Goddard and Yasmin Vinograd for inviting me to be a panelist at the Annotated Guardianship Application program on March 6, 2024. They obviously put a lot of thought and care into choosing interesting topics and great speakers. Each time I participate in the program, I end up learning new things from the other speakers and panelists:

Meredith MacLennan offered three tips for registering guardianship orders on title. Guardianships sometimes arise in situations where the vulnerable person is already being financially exploited. As a guardianship lawyer, I have seen unfortunate situations where vulnerable adults have signed paperwork that is manifestly against their best interests at someone else’s behest. Even with a guardianship order in place, there is nothing stopping a wrongdoer from manipulating an incapable person into signing documents to take out a mortgage or transfer title. Registering the guardianship order on title gives notice to anyone seeking to lend or purchase the home that the owner has a substitute decision maker. However, I learned yesterday that from a conveyancing perspective, this is not as easy as it sounds. Meredith’s top tip was to ask the court for a stand-alone order to register on title because the standard Judgment appending a management plan will not be accepted for registration.

Arthur Fish and Alexander Procope spoke about how to help litigants find an off-ramp from the destructive road of guardianship litigation through alternative dispute resolution. I especially valued Arthur Fish’s insights about delving into the family history of high-conflict/low resolution families to uncover the trauma that is truly driving the family conflict.

Various speakers answered some tough questions from the audience, like whether “joint and several” guardianship appointments are possible (Lisa Filgiano clarified they are not). Doreen So shared an example from her own practice where she came up with a creative partial guardianship solution when a Florida property could not be transferred utilizing an Ontario power of attorney.

The program was chock full of practical advice on how to do a guardianship application from the first meeting with the client through to closing your file. The annotated precedents have been expanded over the years to include a retainer letter, a Notice of Application, an affidavit, a management plan, a guardianship plan, a closing letter, and a Judgment. The program is still available for viewing through the LSO, and I highly recommend it.

 

Angela Casey

 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer. 

LIFE IS A RIDE

When I first started working with Angela Casey, she had a small, dog-eared poster of a car and a bike on her office wall. Under the picture of the car were the words “this one runs on money and makes you fat” and under the bike was written (you’ve guessed it), “this one runs on fat and saves you money”. A silly saying that stuck in my mind as I observed my co-worker energized and happily commuting by bike while I dragged myself to and from the bowels of the subway. Intrigued though I was, I thought it would be too difficult for me to bike from Etobicoke.

In 2013, I had just come back from a second maternity leave after having my son. Like many new parents, I was feeling pretty defeated by a lack of personal time. I was out of shape. Despite a supportive spouse, I couldn’t find my way around getting to a gym or carving out time to workout at home. So I bought a cheap bike and planned out my route.

The first ride was hard. I had to stop midway to catch my breath. But I was also exhilarated: speeding along Lake Ontario, a sunny, perfect June day, feeling stupidly accomplished and content. More than a decade later, despite the occasional spill and stolen bike seat, biking to the office is usually one of the best parts of my day. There is something about exercising and being outside that lifts the mood and clears the mind.

Each year, Baycrest raises funds for dementia research through a charity bike ride on the Gardiner and DVP.  Research is continuing to establish that there is a connection between exercise and brain health, so the event is a fitting one. Our firm has participated the last two years and we’ll do so again this year. Some of our family members are participating too. My 11 year old son is already talking about the tasty corporate team buffet at the end. Whatever gets you motivated to get moving is a good thing IMHO.

Angelique Moss
Partner, Casey & Moss LLP

 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer. 

YOU’RE AN ESTATE TRUSTEE — WHAT NOW?

Completing the Estate Information Return

Congratulations! You have finally received your issued Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee from the court. Now it is time to get your hands dirty and administer the Estate. (While you may have been able to take steps before this time, financial institutions may not recognize your authority until you have a Certificate of Appointment.)

Along with the issued Certificate of Appointment, the court will also provide you with a notice about a form called an Estate information Return (“EIR”). An Estate Information Return must be filed with the Ministry of Finance within 180 days of the date of the Certificate. It is used to enforce compliance with the Estate Administration Tax Act.

The EIR lists details of all the Deceased’s assets and their date of death values. For example, if the Deceased owned a property at the time of their death, you would have to obtain the Deceased’s address, property assessment roll number and property identifier number (PIN). If the Deceased had bank and/or investment accounts, you would need to list the account numbers and contact information for those institutions. If the Deceased had a vehicle, you would have to list the vehicle identification number, make, model and year of that vehicle. The form also requires you to list all other assets such as personal effects and refund cheques that the Deceased may have been entitled to at the time of their passing.

The EIR also gives the estate trustee the opportunity to mention any asset that was missed or discovered after the Application for a Certificate of Appointment was submitted with the court and it allows the estate trustee to pay the applicable estate administration tax for those assets.

It is good practice to diarize the deadline to file the EIR so you won’t miss it!

You can find the form for the EIR along with a guide to assist you here: https://forms.mgcs.gov.on.ca/en/dataset/9955

If you are unable to obtain all asset information within the 180 days deadline, don’t worry, you can file an amended return which would be due within 60 days of the estate trustee becoming aware that the information on the initial return is inaccurate.

If you need help, contact Casey & Moss

 

Felicia Cyril

 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer. 

WE’RE STILL IN IF YOU’RE STILL IN: FURTHER THOUGHTS

Angela wrote a blog recently about Casey & Moss offering me a job as an associate, knowing that I would be heading off on maternity leave just a few months after I started.

I recall so clearly telling Angela and Angelique that I was pregnant and would completely understand if, given the size of the firm at the time, I was not the right fit for them. Without skipping a beat, Angela and Angelique said that, for the right person, they were willing to wait. I was blown away and knew that Casey & Moss was special and a place I wanted to work.

Flash forward to five years, two children, and a pandemic later, I am so grateful for my decision to join Angela, Angelique, and Laura and to be part of the firm they created. Casey & Moss is a remarkable thing: a firm with exceptional lawyers recognized for their expertise, rigor, and mentorship, but also a place where lawyers with young kids, who may have to work from home for a week while also caring for a sick toddler, can genuinely do so without fear or anxiety about how it will affect potential entry into the partnership.

When I told the other partners that my family circumstances meant I may have to work remotely for weeks, or sometimes months at a time, the partnership was not only immediately accommodating, but also supportive and even delighted for me to have new experiences and adventures. This is a rare thing in a law firm.

When Angela writes in her blog that, from her perspective, “There will be years that are work-heavy and years that are family-heavy. The right people are the right people, no matter where they are in the family-work cycle of life,” I can attest first-hand to how running a firm with this ethos at its core deeply impacts the culture of a firm. It not only generates loyalty and goodwill amongst its employees, but also the desire and freedom to excel and grow.

 

Cara Zacks

THE UNIQUE ROLE OF THE LITIGATION GUARDIAN: PART 1

This blog is the first in a multi-part series on the distinctive role of the litigation guardian at common law.

 

One of the most important but underappreciated roles in the civil justice system is that of the litigation guardian. Under Rule 7.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, “[u]nless the court orders or a statute provides otherwise, a proceeding shall be commenced, continued or defended on behalf of a party under disability by a litigation guardian.”[1] But where does the concept of a litigation guardian come from, and what does the role require today?

One of the longstanding features of the Western legal tradition is that the law should protect those who are incapable of protecting themselves.[2] Ever since the days of the Roman praetor and his juris consults, courts have required minors and other parties to be accompanied by a tutor or curator. The former was tasked with representing a child up to the age of puberty.[3] The latter, chosen by the minor, could act until the child reached the age of 25. While a tutor was responsible for protecting a child’s person and property, a curator’s duties extended to a child’s property and litigation.[4] The curator’s power could either be “general” or “special”: they could be granted a general power over a child’s estate or appointed for a specific transaction with limited authority.[5]

The origins of the litigation guardian can also be traced to the canon law of the Church. For example, the Church claimed a general jurisdiction over miserabiles personae, those who by vulnerability or incapacity could not protect themselves. In family proceedings, children frequently came under the jurisdiction of the Church when dealing with annulments and domestic relations. Ecclesiastical courts also had exclusive jurisdiction over probate, and often appointed guardians to ensure that minors received their legitime under a will or on an intestacy.[6]

In England, these Roman and canonical concepts were slowly transformed into the notion of the common law guardian. Not unlike the Church, the King served as parens patriae (“parent of the nation”) of all non-sui juris persons, including children and incapable adults. In this role, the King could issue letters patent to appoint a person to act as guardian of a child or incapable person. This law was initially “disjointed,” recognizing at least ten kinds of guardians under narrowly defined circumstances. Moreover, the Roman distinction between tutor and curator was often blurred.[7] Despite these deficiencies, the role of the common law guardian persisted alongside the jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts. The protective function of the King later passed to the Court of Chancery, but the role of guardian remained and continued to be refined.[8]

By an early English statute, children were permitted to participate in court proceedings with the assistance of a special guardian.[9] Historically, a person acting for a plaintiff in a suit was referred to as prochein ami (“next friend”), while one acting for a defendant was the guardian ad litem.[10] This distinction was later dropped, and the terms became interchangeable. Today the role is commonly known as “litigation guardian,” representing “the modern equivalent to the Roman special curatore and the English common law guardian” but limited to representing a party under disability in court.[11]

In Part 2, we will explore how this role became part of the law in Ontario and discuss some of its distinctive features. Stay tuned!

 

Adam Giancola

 

 

[1] Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194, r 7.01.

[2] Martin D Begleiter, “The Guardian Ad Litem in Estate Proceedings” (1984) 20 Williamette L Rev 643 [Begleiter, “The Guardian At Litem”] at 645.

[3] Richard H Helmholz, “Roman Law of Guardianship in England, 1300-1600” (1978) 52:2 Tulane L Rev 223 [Helmolz, “Roman Law of Guardianship”] at 229.

[4] Ibid at 229.

[5] Begleiter, “The Guardian At Litem” at 645.

[6] Helholz, “Roman Law of Guardianship” at 225-27.

[7] Begleiter, “The Guardian At Litem” at 646.

[8] Ibid at 646.

[9] Ibid at 646.

[10] Ibid at 646, note 26.

[11] Ibid at 646.

 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer.