COULD YOU BE ENTITLED TO FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM AN ESTATE EVEN IF YOU AREN’T A BENEFICIARY?

Typically, the expectation when someone dies with a Will is that the beneficiaries named in the Will inherit the estate. Similarly, if someone dies without a Will, it seems reasonable to assume that the estate will be distributed to the beneficiaries established under the rules of intestacy in the Succession Law Reform Act.

While this is all true, there may be a person (or even more than one person) not named in the Will, or who isn’t a beneficiary according to the rules of intestacy, but who is still entitled to funds from the estate, if that person is considered a dependant of the deceased. These dependants may make a claim against the estate for funds, even if they aren’t estate beneficiaries.

When a dependant claims support from an estate, this may mean that beneficiaries end up inheriting a smaller portion of the estate than they otherwise would. It also means that assets that typically pass outside the estate, like an insurance policy, a registered account like an RRSP, or even a jointly owned property, may be considered part of the estate for the purpose of the dependant support claim. This is the case even if these assets have already been distributed to the beneficiaries.

But who qualifies for dependant support from the estate? There is a two-part test set out in the Succession Law Reform Act that helps answer this question. First, the person claiming support must be a dependant of the deceased, meaning they were either a spouse, parent, child, or sibling of the deceased to whom, immediately before death, the deceased was providing, or had a legal obligation to provide, support. Note that “spouse” includes a common-law spouse who was never married to the deceased.

If the person fits within the definition of “dependant”, the next part of the test is to determine whether the deceased made adequate provisions for proper support of that dependant. For example, is that dependant already a beneficiary of the estate receiving proper support? Or is that dependant a beneficiary of the deceased’s life insurance policy and already receiving proper support that way? If not, the dependant may be able to bring a court application for support from the estate.

Lawyers can advise potential dependants, as well as estate trustees, on whether there is a potential dependant support claim, when that claim must be brought, and how it may impact the distribution of the estate.

 

Cara Zacks

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer.

DOES BIRTH ORDER SHAPE YOUR ESTATE LITIGATION?

Pop science is full of theories as to what effect birth order has on one’s personality, and how it influences behaviour and shapes development.  Eldest children (especially daughters) are said to responsible and high achievers. Middle children are social and rebellious. Youngest children are charming and manipulative.

Theories link education and IQ to birth order, as well as risk tolerance. You can read studies suggesting that birth order will shape your career, romantic partnerships, and physical health. Some psychologists believe these differences exist even outside cultural norms that treat children differently based on gender or birth order.

So, does birth order also influence estate litigation?

In our practice, disputes among siblings are common. The parties to a will challenge or other estate dispute are often the Deceased’s children. And while there may be no science supporting a link between birth order and personality, people do tend to play a certain role in their family, whether a result of those roles being foisted upon them, because they have voluntarily taken them on, or because of more nuanced ways that people develop in a relation to other people.

In estate litigation, as with any dispute among family members, those childhood roles can rise to the forefront, pulling siblings into the same dynamics they had growing up. This can be deeply upsetting, and add to the emotional toll of litigation. It can also contribute to parties becoming entrenched in their positions. For this reason (and many others), anyone involved in litigation against family members should be sure to seek out support, including from friends, a therapist (always a good idea!), and some basic self-care. While your lawyers can advise you on the risks and benefits of various legal positions, there may be other interpersonal dynamics at play in the background, and there are other important considerations, including personal wellbeing and the health of family relationships, to take into account in making decisions in your litigation.  These aren’t commercial disputes among arms’-length parties, and it’s rarely as simple as one side being right and the other wrong.

 

Laura Cardiff 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer.

END OF LIFE CARE: DID YOU KNOW?

Dying with Dignity Canada is a charitable organization that is 100% funded by private donations. The work of their national chapter is probably best known. It engages in advocacy, in particular to expand access to Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). However, Dying with Dignity’s local chapters are committed to community education on a variety of topics related to end of life, including how to access care, what the available options are, what questions to ask and what information to consider in decision making. This is practical, accessible information that can be of real use to families faced with tough decisions. As a starting place, their website has a variety of information and educational resources.

Local chapters run lunch and learn sessions and other educational seminars, and will respond to enquiries for private sessions geared towards a specific audience. Their sessions can educate attendees on palliative care and practical tips for individuals and their families trying to get the best care that will meet their goals, whatever those may be and in their individual circumstances.

 

Laura Cardiff 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer.

ACTING AS A LOVED ONE’S LITIGATION GUARDIAN: RESPONSIBILITIES AND RISKS

This blog post expands on Adam Giancola’s blog series about the role of litigation guardian at common law.

 

If your loved one is involved in litigation but lacks the capacity to understand and make sound decisions related to their court proceeding, or is a child under the age of eighteen, they will require a litigation guardian to participate in litigation. All litigation guardians must be over the age of eighteen.

A litigation guardian steps into the shoes of the party under disability and makes decisions arising from the litigation on that person’s behalf. It is a considerable and often demanding role, but one that is critically important to safeguarding the interests of parties under disability in Ontario.

 

Getting Started

Under Rule 7.02(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, any person who wishes to act as a litigation guardian, except the Children’s Lawyer and Public Guardian and Trustee, must file an affidavit with the court with the following information:

  • the proposed litigation guardian’s consent to act as litigation guardian;
  • confirmation that a named lawyer has been given written authority to act in the proceeding;
  • evidence regarding the nature and extent of the disability;
  • where acting for a minor, the minor’s birthday;
  • whether themselves and the person under disability are Ontario residents (the proposed litigation guardian is not strictly required to live in Ontario, but this is a factor for the court to consider);
  • their relationship to the person under disability (you do not have to be a family member);
  • whether the proposed litigation guardian has an interest in the proceeding adverse to the person under disability; and
  • acknowledges that they have been advised they may be liable to personally pay a costs award against the person under disability.

 

Responsibilities

The Rules of Civil Procedure sets out various requirements for litigation guardians:

  • Litigation guardians, other than the Children’s Lawyer and Public Guardian and Trustee, must be represented by a lawyer. These fees are to be paid from the party under disability’s assets.
  • All litigation guardians “must diligently attend to the interests of the person under disability and take all steps necessary for the protection of those interests”. Procedurally, this means ensuring that the correct procedures are followed. Substantively, this means acting reasonably and properly for the benefit of the person under disability.
  • The litigation guardian, on behalf of the party under disability, may only enter settlements that are in the best interests of the person under disability. Where there is a party under disability, judicial approval of the settlement is required and courts will only approve settlements that are in the best interest of that person. A lawyer will provide the litigation guardian with advice on what settlements may or may not be in the party under disability’s best interest.

It is also important to understand where the role of a litigation guardian starts and ends. A litigation guardian is not the same as a guardian or attorney for property or personal care. A litigation guardian’s role does not extend beyond issues within the litigation. Unless they are also an attorney or guardian of property, a litigation guardian cannot manage or hold the property of the person under disability, which includes settlement funds.

 

Risk

In litigation generally, the losing party is responsible for paying a reasonable share of the winning party’s legal fees; this is called a “costs” award.

As discussed above, there is a risk that a litigation guardian could be personally liable for costs awards against the person under disability. The reason for this is to prevent litigation guardians from acting frivolously or improperly at the expense of the party under disability.

This risk is why it is especially important for litigation guardians to hire competent, trusted counsel to provide advice on how to act reasonably and appropriately during litigation.

 

Rebecca Suggitt

 

Nothing contained in this post constitutes legal advice or establishes a solicitor-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding your legal rights or legal obligations, you should consult a lawyer.